![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Between pandering to Rowling and Zemeckis, and the tired "lets do something with the old bard" saw, I do think that "The Shakespeare Code" is just not as good as "Smith & Jones" right down to all the silly notion that it was all the Doctor and his Companion that thought up all the bard's best bits (which neatly and sadly defuses the chief premise of the plot's resolution).
Also, I can't help but notice the alarming, parallel similarity between this ep and "The Unquiet Dead". So similar, in fact, that it's almost as if the first is a re-write of the second (as I think "The Unquiet Dead" was a far more interesting episode).
I do hope that this season gets better: it's a bit nasty to be hitting a low-point in your second episode of the season.
And as for Agyeman's doe eyed longing flung Tennants way in the bedroom scene, well, I was really hoping we could have given the whole "Dr and Companion's Sexual Tension" bit something of a rest, but it appears that maybe we haven't.
The teaser for next week has re-seated the hook, but "Code" is a bit of fluff that ranks near the bottom of the list of Davies' efforts, I think.
Also, I can't help but notice the alarming, parallel similarity between this ep and "The Unquiet Dead". So similar, in fact, that it's almost as if the first is a re-write of the second (as I think "The Unquiet Dead" was a far more interesting episode).
I do hope that this season gets better: it's a bit nasty to be hitting a low-point in your second episode of the season.
And as for Agyeman's doe eyed longing flung Tennants way in the bedroom scene, well, I was really hoping we could have given the whole "Dr and Companion's Sexual Tension" bit something of a rest, but it appears that maybe we haven't.
The teaser for next week has re-seated the hook, but "Code" is a bit of fluff that ranks near the bottom of the list of Davies' efforts, I think.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-13 00:02 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-13 12:35 (UTC)However, I happily cop to over-reacting by calling it a low-point. 8)
no subject
Date: 2007-04-13 17:02 (UTC)I like Martha, though. I do.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-13 20:15 (UTC)I do, too. I'm prepared to like her even more than ::gasp:: Rose. However, I grant that this may be a heretical position... 8)
Off the hop, I think I like her more than I liked Rose off the hop. We shall just have to see where it goes, though.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-13 23:33 (UTC)I think they made a good choice with presenting Martha as intelligent, curious and happy - there's a sense with Rose that the Doctor's intervention rescued her from a life of anonymous mediocrity and openned Rose's eyes to her own potential. Martha, on the other hand, is a med student, the rock of her family, generally very stable. She's not really escaping with the Doctor, she's adventuring and I think that's much easier to like and understand off the hop. Also, she's educated and I think there's an ingrained bias in North America in that we equate education and intelligence to a greater extent than in the UK (for all sorts of reasons), which is another reason why I found myself taking to Martha while Rose had to grow on me a bit.
We shall just have to see where it goes, though.
Indeed. Rose grew into one of those iconic characters in my opinion, a sort of class apart. Then again, it took me forever to warm to the Tenth Doctor - I thought he was quite mean to good old Harriet Jones, PM (then agian, I am a bloody-minded Machiavellian git when it comes to alien invasions).
no subject
Date: 2007-04-13 00:11 (UTC)It's almost like the subtle, background thing that may have existed between the Doc and some of his companions back in the day* now needs to be: a) nurtured until it becomes an undeniable aspect of the show; then b) held up to the light of rigorous examination.
A friend joked recently that "saving the universe a million times is a poor excuse for sexual predation." He meant it in good fun, but the more they focus on it, the more it gives me a creepy kind of feeling.
Doug.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-13 12:41 (UTC)Yeah, there's no doubt that it's a bit off-putting to have Doctor swan around with companions that are so obviously young women. But I suppose that's part of the allure of the new series' writing: there's a strong focus on the travels as a sort of bildungsroman for these women.
This focus leands extra weight to the best of the new series episodes (like "Quiet Dead", "School Reunion", "The Girl In The Fireplace").
It's probably an artefact of being so far in the past, and me being so young at that point, but I don't remember the "young woman as companion" theme being so pronounced in the Who series that I grew up watching...
Obviously, I need at least one more Doctor Who icon
Date: 2007-04-13 17:08 (UTC)Re: Obviously, I need at least one more Doctor Who icon
Date: 2007-04-13 20:18 (UTC)