viktor_haag: (Default)
[personal profile] viktor_haag
I note several things:

(a) I spend much much less on comics these days than I used to.

(b) I actually read only a handful of titles (and by handful, I mean maybe four or five), and for only two of those do I buy single issues (Hellboy and BPRD).

(c) Have comics always been this blatantly sexist?

I'm coming to the sad conclusion that Greg Land is the rule not the exception (ed: yes, I know that link doesn't produce an example of Land's work, but the subtext is similar).

Bah.

Date: 2007-03-22 14:35 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] waiwode.livejournal.com
Just google her image. Much has been blogged about how Power Girl has been defined by her cleavage. (Slightly inappropriate for work).

She has been re-written, re-vamped, re-drawn, and re-done more than any other DC hero* ... I blame it on the fact that she's bland, generic, unthrilling, and to lean on D&D RPG theory ... she infringes on too many other characters' niches. Supergirl & Superman's Kryptonianism. Wonder Woman & Supergirl's "strong invulnerable flying woman" schtick. She needs a niche of her own ... but that would require yet another re-imagining.

Doug.

*I have no proof for that.

Date: 2007-03-22 15:02 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madmanofprague.livejournal.com
Where I read about the cover. Because while I read a lotta comics, I don't actually read superhero books.

Date: 2007-03-22 20:53 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] viktor-haag.livejournal.com
Cool. Does Amy Winehouse have the capability to produce consonants at all when see sings? It doesn't seem so...

Date: 2007-03-22 16:26 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sixteenbynine.livejournal.com
I'm in the odd position of owning stock in Marvel Entertainment without actually being interested in their comics. The movie franchises have proved to be a lot more interesting than what the comics have been lately!

Date: 2007-03-22 20:32 (UTC)
mneme: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mneme
I think that among comic women, Power Girl (and her breasts) is iconic for this sort of thing.

-Still- not as bad (as far as I've seen) as the Savant and Sorcerer cover (http://boardgameclub.co.uk/images/WW8805.jpg).

Date: 2007-03-22 20:49 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] viktor-haag.livejournal.com
Good GAWD.

That verges (infringes) on being NSFW.

Date: 2007-03-22 21:01 (UTC)
mneme: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mneme
Yeah. I should have tagged it (well, ok, I don't use NSFW, but as "warning: painted on clothing, full-frontal"). Most sexualized rpg book cover -ever-.

Profile

viktor_haag: (Default)
viktor_haag

April 2011

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
1011121314 1516
1718 1920212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 17th, 2026 19:11
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios