I may not agree with him, but he's a darned good wordsmith

[viktor_haag]

On the advice of Mr Tony, I have started to follow Charles Krauthammer's articles at the Washington Post. You should, too. While I may not agree with his point of view or his politics, Krauthammer's voice is very well crafted indeed.

In his latest, as he explains how Clinton has managed to get off the matt and take it to Obama, Krauthammer makes a quiet case for why USAmericans should maybe not be so darned quick to embrace the new guy. I love this quote:

The Obama campaign has sent journalists eight pages of examples of his reaching across the aisle in the Senate. I am not the only one to note, however, that these are small-bore items of almost no controversy ... [b]ipartisan support for apple pie is hardly a profile in courage.

Ouch.

edit: In related news, it appears that cracks continue to appear in the camp of Mr Shiny Happy. Seriously, Samantha; what the heck were you thinking? Whether you have a case, or not, plainly calling your boss' rival "a monster" is only going to lead to one thing: damage for your boss in the public eye, and a resignation for your ownself. I mean, at least have the decency to call her out on the shaky points of her record and her campaign (of which, no doubt, there have been a few)...

Comments

[brianrogers.livejournal.com]

Is it possible that this view is also being promulgated by the Clinton camp because it leads into their traditional clan mythology?

Oh, almost certainly. If you look back over Clinton's press statements from Super Tuesday forward they steadily reduced expectations from their original high water mark as their poll numbers dropped. So much so that on March 1st or thereabouts she was claiming that unless Obama won both states decisively she should still be considered the de factor winner. Even a loss on her part had become a chance for another reference to the Comeback Kid - especially since Bill came in second in the New Hampshire primary that produced that nickname 16 years ago.